मुंबईत वकिलांना लोकल ट्रेनने प्रवास करण्याची परवानगी नाही

काल जारी झालेल्या राज्य सरकारच्या नवीन निर्बंधांनुसार वकिलांना मुंबईत लोकल ट्रेन ने प्रवास करण्याची परवानगी देण्यात आलेली नाही.

 

१४ एप्रिल पासून राज्यात लागू करण्यात आलेल्या नियमांमध्ये वकिलांना त्यांची कार्यालये सुरू ठेवण्याची मुभा देण्यात आली होती.

 

त्यानंतर मुंबईत वाहनांसाठी लागू केलेल्या  स्टिकर सक्ती मध्येही वकिलांना पिवळे स्टिकर लावून आपले वाहन घेऊन प्रवास करण्यास परवानगी देण्यात आली होती.

 

परंतु २१ तारखेला लागू झालेल्या नियमांनुसार मुंबईत लोकल ट्रेन ने प्रवास करण्याची परवानगी केवळ आरोग्य सेवा कर्मचारी, शासकीय कर्मचारी आणि उपचारांची गरज असलेल्या व्यक्ती, डिव्यांग व्यक्ती किंवा त्यांच्या बरोबर असलेल्या व्यक्ती ह्यांनाच देण्यात आली आहे.

     

वकिलांना लोकल ट्रेन प्रवासाची परवानगी नाही. त्यांना आपले खाजगी वाहन वापरण्यास परवानगी आहे.

 

राज्य सरकारच्या नियमांनुसार रेल्वे तर्फे एक यादी जाहीर करण्यात आली आहे.

Mumbai local train

लोकल ट्रेन प्रवासाची परवानगी असलेल्यांची ही यादी आहे. ह्यातही वकिलांचा समावेश करण्यात आलेला नाही. न्यायालयाच्या कर्मचाऱ्यांचा ह्यात समावेश आहे.

 

सरकारने जारी केलेल्या एका स्पष्कटीरणातही वकिलांना लोकल ट्रेन प्रवासाची परवानगी नसल्याचे म्हंटले आहे.

  Answers to FAQ on Break The Chain rules Maharashtra  

खाजगी वाहन नसलेल्या मुंबईतील वकिलांना आता office चालू ठेवण्याची परवानगी असतानाही अडचणींचा सामना करावा लागणार आहे.

24 thoughts on “मुंबईत वकिलांना लोकल ट्रेनने प्रवास करण्याची परवानगी नाही

  1. Advocates provide us vital services in our entire country and putting such restrictions is big insult for entire judiciary, Advocates are compelled to take lengthy procedure for their lawful rights… Disappointed with the decision

    1. We are not part of administration we are part of judiciary ,we always fight for other rights were is our rights

    2. LawMarathi ला दिलेल्या प्रतिसादाबद्दल धन्यवाद! कायदेविषयक सर्व घडामोडींच्या अपडेट्स साठी 🔔 आयकॉन वर क्लिक करून सबस्क्राईब करा.

    1. Ban to advocates to travel by locals is injustice. Though right to justice and speedy trial is fundamental rights of the their clients is not injustice? Each and every advocates not having their own vehicles. So what is the use of allowing them to travel with their vehicles?

  2. The said decision has disappointed lawyer deeply as all advocates do not have private vehicles to travel and most importantly lady advocates have family responsibilities too and therefore it is difficult for them to travel by road, road traveling is time consuming,, highly disappointed with the decision

  3. We are pillar of constitution . It is like an Learned Advoacte s to be kept away, from day to day activities, and make them economic weak, as well down grade the profession
    As earlier done with Dr. B. R. Ambedkar saheb at the time of first election which fought from mumbai seat, And all anti had done groupism and made them loose the election

  4. Advocates are officers of court. Judicial function is not possible without advoctes. So, restricting advocates from travelling in local trains would in other way restrict smooth functioning of judicial work.

  5. Advocates needs to b given permission as they serve in parallel way n at par wit government,,judiciary n also wit a helping hand to many innocent citizens.
    This is great insult n also lowering the noble profession which is then back none of our country n plays a vital role in national pandemic for minimising of much panic in the society at large .

  6. shri. uddhav thakare government is behaving like a dictator and has violated article 21 of the constitution of india by impossing forcefull obligations on citizens on their movement.advocates are officers of the court and plays an essential and important role in fuctioning day today fuctions / work of juduciary may it be MM court,SESSIONS COURT or HIGH COURT.Not allowing to travel by trains or buses is a high degree of insult to the advocates faternity at large.i strongly object this abitrary and ultra virus decission of CM.

  7. This is a great insult to pillars of judiciary officer of court can’t travel and court staff is allowed is this a joke a court without advocate what a move its time we as advocate stand for our dignity

  8. Urgent hearing cases and old cases at final stage of hearing urgency to b considered for eg.Promoyion orders ,issued by Western railway during pandemic situation,Cerntral Administrative tribunal urgent cases,due unfair ,improper action of WR management employees are adversely affected in such cases litigants r suffering in some cases company management is taking illegal action workers r suffering hence advocate should b allowed to travel by Train,as s
    All adv have no own car

  9. If the advocate doesn’t have his/ her private vehicle and railways(local) is the only mode of transportation for them and if dey are not allowed to travel then how will they go to the courts and will the cases will be disposed. there r already piles of cases pending in all the courts and with decision the numbers will increase and the litigants also has to face the trauma. so the governments decision is not accepted and advocates should b allowed to travel by local trains. Some of the advocates travel from faraway distance and d government should consider their plight.

  10. When an advocate is a part of Judiciary and do justice for the people and why advocate is not allow in train such decision are incapable thinking of Govt. So therefore Bombay
    high Courts pass Suo motto order to protect Rights of advocates who protectes an interest of Society at large in Bombay High Court Matters . Regards, Adv. Vaibhav R Shah

  11. We do understand about the current scenario but also we are ready to take all the necessary precautions to be safe. If the advocate doesn’t have his/ her private vehicle and railways(local) is the only mode of transportation for them and if they are not allowed to travel then how will they go to the courts and will the cases will be disposed. there are already piles of cases pending in all the courts and with decision the numbers will increase and the litigants also has to face the trauma. so the governments decision is not accepted and advocates should be allowed to travel by local trains. Some of the advocates travel from faraway distance and the government should consider their plight.

  12. I failed to understand, why govt. is not treating Advocates as part of judiciary. Without Advocates justice can’t be done. Govt should rethink of their decision and allow Advocates to travel by train. Most of Advocates stay in suburban areas and train is the convenient way to travel. Many Advocates don’t have private vehicles.

  13. Really pathetic !!
    Its shame to entire advoacte faternity that we are not permitted to travel, why we are always under preveliged ?????

  14. Advocates have to work more than in their offices. Only allowing to open their offices is not logical.

  15. how can a lawyer survive if govt can not allow to travel them???
    govt has not providing us any other facility also but preventing to practice by this way…

  16. अ‍ॅडव्होकेट्स असोसिएशन हे राज्य सरकारचे एक अनिवार्य कर्तव्य आहे, आणि असोसिएशनला आवश्यक असणाऱ्या किमान सोयीसुविधा व निधी उपलब्ध करुन देणे राज्याचे कर्तव्य आहे. दुसरी गोष्ट अशी आहे की, अ‍ॅडव्होकेट्स असोसिएशन प्रभावी, सक्षम, स्वतंत्र व निर्भय असावा यासाठी कोर्टाचे अधिकारी म्हणून कामकाजासाठी आवश्यक किमान सुविधा पुरविल्या पाहिजेत. रेल्वे प्रवासाची सुविधा हि त्यामधीलच एक सुविधा आहे. असे माझे वैयक्तिक मत आहे. Advocate SUNIL MAROTI TAYADE, MALKAPUR_GRAMIN. TAHSIL-MALKAPUR. DISTRICT – BULDANA. MAHARASHTRA. INDIA. PINCODE – 443101 suniltayademku@gmail.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!